LogoLogo
Product
  • Knowledge Base
  • What's New
  • Guides
  • User Story Coverage
    • Getting Started
    • User Story Challenges & Solution
      • Typical Implementation
      • The Challenges
      • The Solution
    • User Story Coverage Report Overview
      • Release Go / No Go Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • User Story Quality Overview
        • How to Generate the User Story View
      • User Story Coverage Analysis
        • How to Generate the Analysis View
      • Uncovered Methods View
        • How to Generate the View
      • Customization
      • Integration
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Informed Go/No Go Decisions Making
        • Effective Resources Prioritization
        • Overall Progress Monitoring
      • Developers
        • Code Quality Ownership
        • Seamless Collaboration with QA
        • Code Review Facilitator
      • QA Engineers
        • Test Execution Progress Monitoring
        • Testing Effort Prioritization
        • Testing Strategy Planing
    • Technical Overview
      • User Story Coverage Mechanism
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
        • US1_getResults.sh
        • US2_createReport.sh
        • US_UpdateConfluence.sh
  • Test Optimization
    • Getting Started
    • Test Execution Challenges & Solution
      • The Challenges
      • Test Optimization Solution
      • Test Optimization Main Advantages
    • Test Optimization Overview
      • Automated Test Optimization
      • Manual Test Optimization
      • Test Optimization for Pull Request
      • Test Selection Policies
        • Full Run Policy
        • No Code Changes Policy
        • Common Code Policy
        • Fastest Path to 100% Coverage Policy
      • Integrations
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Fast Delivery
        • Resource Optimization
        • Thorough Testing in Tight Schedule
      • Developers
        • Exploring Only Relevant Test Failures
        • Faster Feedback Loop
        • Shift Left Testing
      • QA Engineers & Manual Testers
        • Faster & Focused Manual Testing
        • Optimizing Test Suite
        • Having Stable Product for Testing
    • Technical Overview
      • Test Optimization Mechanism
        • Associating Code With Tests
          • Statistical modeling
          • One-to-One Mapping
          • Calibration
        • Detecting Modified Code
        • Generating Test Recommendations
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
  • Quality Improvement
    • Getting Started
    • Challenges & Approach Comparison
      • The Challenges
      • Quality Improvement Approaches
      • Choosing the Right Approach
    • Quality Improvement Solution Overview
      • Test Gaps Analysis Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Coverage Trend Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Proof of Testing Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Release Quality Improvement Guide
        • STEP 1: Deploy SeaLights
        • STEP 2: Take a Quality Snapshot
        • STEP 3: Prioritize Code Areas
          • Add Code Labels
          • Ignore Irrelevant Code
          • Perform a Deep CSV Analysis
        • STEP 4: Set Baseline & Threshold
        • STEP 5: Analyze Test Gaps
        • STEP 6: Write Tests
        • Step 7: Make a Go / No Go Decision Based on Quality Gate
        • STEP 8: Measure Defect Escape Rate
      • Over Time Quality Improvement Guide
        • STEP 1: Deploy SeaLights
        • STEP 2: Take a Quality Snapshot
        • STEP 3: Prioritize code areas
          • Add Code Labels
          • Ignore Irrelevant Code
          • Perform a Deep CSV Analysis
        • STEP 4: Set Baseline & Goal
        • STEP 5: Set timeline
        • STEP 6: Write tests
        • STEP 7: Monitor progress
        • STEP 8: Measure Defect Escape Rate
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Effective Prioritization & Budget Allocation
        • Tracking Progress & Measuring Impact
        • Data-Driven Release Decisions
        • Transparency & Communication
      • Developers
        • Mastering Code Coverage
        • Seamless Collaboration with QA
        • Code Quality Ownership
      • QA Engineers
        • Prioritizing Test Efforts
        • Contributing to Release Informed Decisions
        • Seamless Collaboration with Developers
        • Evaluating Testing Strategy
    • Technical Overview
      • Solution Mechanism
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
  • Value Proposition
    • Overview
    • Quality Use Cases
      • Go/No Go Decisions
      • Quality Improvement & Test Gaps
      • Governance & Quality Gates
      • Compliance & Proof of Testing
    • Test Optimization Use Cases
      • Reduce Costs & Infrastructure
      • Shorten Release Cycles
      • Reduce Troubleshooting
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Quality Improvement
  2. Quality Improvement Solution Overview
  3. Release Quality Improvement Guide

Step 7: Make a Go / No Go Decision Based on Quality Gate

PreviousSTEP 6: Write TestsNextSTEP 8: Measure Defect Escape Rate

Was this helpful?

Typically, this step is done by QA Manager/Architect or Engineering Manager.

The Code Changes Coverage threshold serves as a critical quality gate for your release, determining the minimum acceptable level of quality before promoting a build to production. Choose your quality gate wisely:

  • Soft Gate (recommended initially): Serves as a warning flag, allowing manual overrides based on gap analysis.

  • Hard Gate: The ultimate gatekeeper, automatically blocking builds below the threshold.

Learn how to add a new soft quality gate by watching the video tutorial.

Making the Call:

  1. Analyze Coverage: Has your release reached the threshold?

  2. Gap Exploration: If below, delve into the gaps. Are they non-critical? Proceed cautiously to production.

  3. Critical Gaps: Address the gaps now or post-release?

    • Post-release: Create a dedicated backlog for swift resolution. Incorporated the backlog into the test automation process for new functionality and complete it after the release.

    • Delay the release: Prioritize quality, address gaps first.

Remember! While reviewing the coverage, it is advisable to exclude the Unit Tests coverage if it exists in your report, as it may create a false impression of complete functionality testing.

By following these steps, you can effectively utilize the data from the reports, make informed decisions about production readiness, and ensure that important test gaps are addressed promptly.

Evolving Gates:

After successfully implementing the soft quality gate for several releases and it becomes an essential part of your Go/No Go decision-making process, you can evaluate the possibility of integrating it into your automated gates. However, if you consistently proceed to production even when the quality level is below the gate, it may indicate that the automated implementation is premature for your organization.