LogoLogo
Product
  • Knowledge Base
  • What's New
  • Guides
  • Welcome!
  • Intro to SeaLights
    • What is SeaLights
      • Glossary
      • Working in Conjunction with Your Quality / Coverage Tools
        • SeaLights vs SonarQube
        • SeaLights vs JaCoCo
    • Technical Overview
      • Test Stage Cycle
    • FAQ
  • User Story Coverage
    • Getting Started
    • User Story Challenges & Solution
      • Typical Implementation
      • The Challenges
      • The Solution
    • User Story Coverage Report Overview
      • Release Go / No Go Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • User Story Quality Overview
        • How to Generate the User Story View
      • User Story Coverage Analysis
        • How to Generate the Analysis View
      • Uncovered Methods View
        • How to Generate the View
      • Customization
      • Integration
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Informed Go/No Go Decisions Making
        • Effective Resources Prioritization
        • Overall Progress Monitoring
      • Developers
        • Code Quality Ownership
        • Seamless Collaboration with QA
        • Code Review Facilitator
      • QA Engineers
        • Test Execution Progress Monitoring
        • Testing Effort Prioritization
        • Testing Strategy Planing
    • Technical Overview
      • User Story Coverage Mechanism
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
        • US1_getResults.sh
        • US2_createReport.sh
        • US_UpdateConfluence.sh
  • Test Optimization
    • Getting Started
    • Test Execution Challenges & Solution
      • The Challenges
      • Test Optimization Solution
      • Test Optimization Main Advantages
    • Test Optimization Overview
      • Automated Test Optimization
      • Manual Test Optimization
      • Test Optimization for Pull Request
      • Test Selection Policies
        • Full Run Policy
        • No Code Changes Policy
        • Common Code Policy
        • Fastest Path to 100% Coverage Policy
      • Integrations
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Fast Delivery
        • Resource Optimization
        • Thorough Testing in Tight Schedule
      • Developers
        • Exploring Only Relevant Test Failures
        • Faster Feedback Loop
        • Shift Left Testing
      • QA Engineers & Manual Testers
        • Faster & Focused Manual Testing
        • Optimizing Test Suite
        • Having Stable Product for Testing
    • Technical Overview
      • Test Optimization Mechanism
        • Associating Code With Tests
          • Statistical modeling
          • One-to-One Mapping
          • Calibration
        • Detecting Modified Code
        • Generating Test Recommendations
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
  • Quality Improvement
    • Getting Started
    • Challenges & Approach Comparison
      • The Challenges
      • Quality Improvement Approaches
      • Choosing the Right Approach
    • Quality Improvement Solution Overview
      • Test Gaps Analysis Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Coverage Trend Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Proof of Testing Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Release Quality Improvement Guide
        • STEP 1: Deploy SeaLights
        • STEP 2: Take a Quality Snapshot
        • STEP 3: Prioritize Code Areas
          • Add Code Labels
          • Ignore Irrelevant Code
          • Perform a Deep CSV Analysis
        • STEP 4: Set Baseline & Threshold
        • STEP 5: Analyze Test Gaps
        • STEP 6: Write Tests
        • Step 7: Make a Go / No Go Decision Based on Quality Gate
        • STEP 8: Measure Defect Escape Rate
      • Over Time Quality Improvement Guide
        • STEP 1: Deploy SeaLights
        • STEP 2: Take a Quality Snapshot
        • STEP 3: Prioritize code areas
          • Add Code Labels
          • Ignore Irrelevant Code
          • Perform a Deep CSV Analysis
        • STEP 4: Set Baseline & Goal
        • STEP 5: Set timeline
        • STEP 6: Write tests
        • STEP 7: Monitor progress
        • STEP 8: Measure Defect Escape Rate
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Effective Prioritization & Budget Allocation
        • Tracking Progress & Measuring Impact
        • Data-Driven Release Decisions
        • Transparency & Communication
      • Developers
        • Mastering Code Coverage
        • Seamless Collaboration with QA
        • Code Quality Ownership
      • QA Engineers
        • Prioritizing Test Efforts
        • Contributing to Release Informed Decisions
        • Seamless Collaboration with Developers
        • Evaluating Testing Strategy
    • Technical Overview
      • Solution Mechanism
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
  • Features
    • Coverage Dashboard
    • Coverage Report
    • Test Gaps Report
      • Code Changes Calculation
        • Hidden Changes Detection
    • Test Optimization - Savings Breakdown
      • TIA Configuration
    • Settings
      • Token Access & Management
      • Quality Gates
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Complementary tools
  • Working Together for Improved Quality
  • SeaLights Focus: Broad Coverage, Streamlined Testing

Was this helpful?

  1. Intro to SeaLights
  2. What is SeaLights

Working in Conjunction with Your Quality / Coverage Tools

PreviousGlossaryNextSeaLights vs SonarQube

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?

While SeaLights excels in optimizing software quality across the entire development lifecycle, it coexists with various other tools you might already be using, like SonarQube and JaCoCo, empowering you to create a robust and efficient quality assurance ecosystem.

Complementary tools

  • SonarQube:

    • Focuses on static code analysis.

    • Identifies potential issues in code structure and conventions (bugs, code smells, and others) in various programming languages.

    • Helps developers write higher quality code from the beginning.

    • SeaLights perfectly complements SonarQube by analyzing the effectiveness of your testing efforts, ensuring your well-written code is thoroughly tested. Together, they provide a holistic view of software quality.

  • JaCoCo:

    • Primarily focuses on Java unit test coverage.

    • Offers a granular view of individual unit test effectiveness.

    • SeaLights, however, expands on this by providing coverage insights across all test types, including integration, API, and manual tests, giving you a broader picture of your overall testing landscape.

Working Together for Improved Quality

Although they don't integrate directly, these tools can be used concurrently to:

  • Provide a multifaceted approach to software quality:

    • SonarQube ensures code quality, while SeaLights optimizes testing effectiveness.

    • JaCoCo offers granular unit test insights, complementing SeaLights' broader coverage analysis.

  • Avoid tool interference: Each tool operates independently, eliminating conflicts and ensuring smooth operation within your existing workflow.

  • Empower data-driven decision-making: Combine insights from different tools to gain a holistic perspective on your software's quality and make informed decisions.

SeaLights Focus: Broad Coverage, Streamlined Testing

SeaLights optimizes testing efforts across the entire software development lifecycle.

  • Analyzes coverage and efficiency for all test types, including integration, API, manual, and more.

  • Provides modified code coverage, identifying areas needing immediate attention.

  • Recommends which tests to run, optimizing execution time and resources.

  • Offers out-of-the-box reports and insights for effective decision-making.

  • SeaLights doesn't require code access unlike some code coverage tools, making it non-invasive and easy to integrate.


By understanding the unique strengths of each tool and utilizing them in tandem, you can create a powerful combination that enhances code quality, streamlines testing, and ultimately delivers high-quality software.

SeaLights vs SonarQube
SeaLights vs JaCoCo