LogoLogo
Product
  • Knowledge Base
  • What's New
  • Guides
  • Welcome!
  • Intro to SeaLights
    • What is SeaLights
      • Glossary
      • Working in Conjunction with Your Quality / Coverage Tools
        • SeaLights vs SonarQube
        • SeaLights vs JaCoCo
    • Technical Overview
      • Test Stage Cycle
    • FAQ
  • User Story Coverage
    • Getting Started
    • User Story Challenges & Solution
      • Typical Implementation
      • The Challenges
      • The Solution
    • User Story Coverage Report Overview
      • Release Go / No Go Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • User Story Quality Overview
        • How to Generate the User Story View
      • User Story Coverage Analysis
        • How to Generate the Analysis View
      • Uncovered Methods View
        • How to Generate the View
      • Customization
      • Integration
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Informed Go/No Go Decisions Making
        • Effective Resources Prioritization
        • Overall Progress Monitoring
      • Developers
        • Code Quality Ownership
        • Seamless Collaboration with QA
        • Code Review Facilitator
      • QA Engineers
        • Test Execution Progress Monitoring
        • Testing Effort Prioritization
        • Testing Strategy Planing
    • Technical Overview
      • User Story Coverage Mechanism
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
        • US1_getResults.sh
        • US2_createReport.sh
        • US_UpdateConfluence.sh
  • Test Optimization
    • Getting Started
    • Test Execution Challenges & Solution
      • The Challenges
      • Test Optimization Solution
      • Test Optimization Main Advantages
    • Test Optimization Overview
      • Automated Test Optimization
      • Manual Test Optimization
      • Test Optimization for Pull Request
      • Test Selection Policies
        • Full Run Policy
        • No Code Changes Policy
        • Common Code Policy
        • Fastest Path to 100% Coverage Policy
      • Integrations
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Fast Delivery
        • Resource Optimization
        • Thorough Testing in Tight Schedule
      • Developers
        • Exploring Only Relevant Test Failures
        • Faster Feedback Loop
        • Shift Left Testing
      • QA Engineers & Manual Testers
        • Faster & Focused Manual Testing
        • Optimizing Test Suite
        • Having Stable Product for Testing
    • Technical Overview
      • Test Optimization Mechanism
        • Associating Code With Tests
          • Statistical modeling
          • One-to-One Mapping
          • Calibration
        • Detecting Modified Code
        • Generating Test Recommendations
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
  • Quality Improvement
    • Getting Started
    • Challenges & Approach Comparison
      • The Challenges
      • Quality Improvement Approaches
      • Choosing the Right Approach
    • Quality Improvement Solution Overview
      • Test Gaps Analysis Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Coverage Trend Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Proof of Testing Report
        • How to Generate / Edit the Report
      • Release Quality Improvement Guide
        • STEP 1: Deploy SeaLights
        • STEP 2: Take a Quality Snapshot
        • STEP 3: Prioritize Code Areas
          • Add Code Labels
          • Ignore Irrelevant Code
          • Perform a Deep CSV Analysis
        • STEP 4: Set Baseline & Threshold
        • STEP 5: Analyze Test Gaps
        • STEP 6: Write Tests
        • Step 7: Make a Go / No Go Decision Based on Quality Gate
        • STEP 8: Measure Defect Escape Rate
      • Over Time Quality Improvement Guide
        • STEP 1: Deploy SeaLights
        • STEP 2: Take a Quality Snapshot
        • STEP 3: Prioritize code areas
          • Add Code Labels
          • Ignore Irrelevant Code
          • Perform a Deep CSV Analysis
        • STEP 4: Set Baseline & Goal
        • STEP 5: Set timeline
        • STEP 6: Write tests
        • STEP 7: Monitor progress
        • STEP 8: Measure Defect Escape Rate
    • Use Cases by Persona
      • Managers
        • Effective Prioritization & Budget Allocation
        • Tracking Progress & Measuring Impact
        • Data-Driven Release Decisions
        • Transparency & Communication
      • Developers
        • Mastering Code Coverage
        • Seamless Collaboration with QA
        • Code Quality Ownership
      • QA Engineers
        • Prioritizing Test Efforts
        • Contributing to Release Informed Decisions
        • Seamless Collaboration with Developers
        • Evaluating Testing Strategy
    • Technical Overview
      • Solution Mechanism
      • Technical Architecture
      • Deployment Guide
  • Features
    • Coverage Dashboard
    • Coverage Report
    • Test Gaps Report
      • Code Changes Calculation
        • Hidden Changes Detection
    • Test Optimization - Savings Breakdown
      • TIA Configuration
    • Settings
      • Token Access & Management
      • Quality Gates
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

  1. Intro to SeaLights
  2. What is SeaLights
  3. Working in Conjunction with Your Quality / Coverage Tools

SeaLights vs JaCoCo

Both SeaLights and JaCoCo are valuable tools for software development, but they serve different purposes in the testing process. Here's a comparison table highlighting their key differences:

Feature
SeaLights
JaCoCo

Focus

Test optimization across the pipeline

Unit test coverage

Target Audience

Developers, QA owners, testers, product owners, etc.

Developers working on unit tests

Coverage

All test types (unit, integration, API, etc.)

Primarily unit tests

Languages

Cross-language support

Primarily Java

Modified Code Coverage

Analyzes coverage for changed code

Not applicable

Test Gap Analysis

Shows gaps across all testing stages and types

Shows gaps only for unit tests

Code Coverage Analysis

Tracks coverage trends across builds, etc.

Shows coverage data for the current test run only

Test Recommendations

Recommends tests to skip based on code changes

No test recommendations

Test Optimization

Automatically skips unimpacted tests

No test optimization

Ease of Use

Out-of-the-box reports and recommendations

Requires additional configuration for complex use

Integration

Integrates with various testing frameworks

Primarily standalone tool

Cost

Paid

Free and open-source software (OSS)

Key Takeaways

  • SeaLights focuses on optimizing testing efforts across the entire development lifecycle, providing insights into all test types and modified code coverage.

  • JaCoCo focuses specifically on unit test coverage, offering detailed reports for developers.

  • SeaLights is a cross-language tool, while JaCoCo primarily supports Java.

  • SeaLights offers out-of-the-box reports and recommendations, while JaCoCo requires more configuration for advanced use cases.

  • SeaLights integrates with various testing frameworks, whereas JaCoCo is primarily a standalone tool.

  • SeaLights is a paid tool, while JaCoCo is free and open-source.

Choosing the right tool depends on your specific needs and testing environment. If you need a comprehensive solution for optimizing testing across the entire pipeline, SeaLights is a strong option. If your focus is primarily on unit test coverage for Java projects, JaCoCo can be a valuable tool. Both tools can potentially be used together to gain a more holistic view of your code coverage and testing efficiency.

PreviousSeaLights vs SonarQubeNextTechnical Overview

Last updated 1 year ago

Was this helpful?